Questa intervista e’ stata rilasciata dal Presidente Obama all’Arizona Daily Star ed e’ molto importante per quanto riguarda la regolamentazione delle armi da fuoco in America alla quale si oppone a forza di milioni di dollari spesi in lobby la National Rifle Association che raccoglie i produttori di armi negli States. A sua volta Obama viene accusato dai ‘liberals’ di essere troppo tiepido. Bisogna tenere conto che molti parlamentari democratici sono tallonati dai soldi della NRA e spesso si sono mostrati insofferenti alle intenzioni di regolare la vendita di armi in America. Dopo il massacro di Tucson di due mesi fa nel quale un giovane di estrema destra ha sparato su un gruppo di persone che ascoltavano l’onorevole Gabrielle Giffords(un proiettile le ha trapassato il cranio, ma e’ ancora viva) si sono avute 2400 persone morte per armi da fuoco. Lo stesso Dick Cheney, l’ex vicepresidente di W. Bush, sta spostandosi su posizioni moderate in questa materia e chiede norme piu’ severe per la regolamentazione. Ovviamente i tromboni della NRA e i milioni di americani che portano armi addosso sostenendo che si tratta di un diritto garantito dal Secondo Emendamento della Costituzione, sbraitano dicendo che Obama vuole bandire le adorate armi, molte delle quali sono da guerra.
__________________________________________________________
It’s been more than two months since the tragedy in Tucson stunned the nation. It was a moment when we came together as one people to mourn and to pray for those we lost. And in the attack’s turbulent wake, Americans by and large rightly refrained from finger-pointing, assigning blame or playing politics with other people’s pain.
But one clear and terrible fact remains. A man our Army rejected as unfit for service; a man one of our colleges deemed too unstable for studies; a man apparently bent on violence, was able to walk into a store and buy a gun.
He used it to murder six people and wound 13 others. And if not for the heroism of bystanders and a brilliant surgical team, it would have been far worse.
But since that day, we have lost perhaps another 2,000 members of our American family to gun violence. Thousands more have been wounded. We lose the same number of young people to guns every day and a half as we did at Columbine, and every four days as we did at Virginia Tech.
Every single day, America is robbed of more futures. It has awful consequences for our society. And as a society, we have a responsibility to do everything we can to put a stop to it.
Now, like the majority of Americans, I believe that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms. And the courts have settled that as the law of the land. In this country, we have a strong tradition of gun ownership that’s handed from generation to generation. Hunting and shooting are part of our national heritage. And, in fact, my administration has not curtailed the rights of gun owners – it has expanded them, including allowing people to carry their guns in national parks and wildlife refuges.
The fact is, almost all gun owners in America are highly responsible. They’re our friends and neighbors. They buy their guns legally and use them safely, whether for hunting or target shooting, collection or protection. And that’s something that gun-safety advocates need to accept. Likewise, advocates for gun owners should accept the awful reality that gun violence affects Americans everywhere, whether on the streets of Chicago or at a supermarket in Tucson.
I know that every time we try to talk about guns, it can reinforce stark divides. People shout at one another, which makes it impossible to listen. We mire ourselves in stalemate, which makes it impossible to get to where we need to go as a country.
However, I believe that if common sense prevails, we can get beyond wedge issues and stale political debates to find a sensible, intelligent way to make the United States of America a safer, stronger place.
I’m willing to bet that responsible, law-abiding gun owners agree that we should be able to keep an irresponsible, law-breaking few – dangerous criminals and fugitives, for example – from getting their hands on a gun in the first place.
I’m willing to bet they don’t think that using a gun and using common sense are incompatible ideas – that we should check someone’s criminal record before he can check out at a gun seller; that an unbalanced man shouldn’t be able to buy a gun so easily; that there’s room for us to have reasonable laws that uphold liberty, ensure citizen safety and are fully compatible with a robust Second Amendment.
That’s why our focus right now should be on sound and effective steps that will actually keep those irresponsible, law-breaking few from getting their hands on a gun in the first place.
• First, we should begin by enforcing laws that are already on the books. The National Instant Criminal Background Check System is the filter that’s supposed to stop the wrong people from getting their hands on a gun. Bipartisan legislation four years ago was supposed to strengthen this system, but it hasn’t been properly implemented. It relies on data supplied by states – but that data is often incomplete and inadequate. We must do better.
• Second, we should in fact reward the states that provide the best data – and therefore do the most to protect our citizens.
• Third, we should make the system faster and nimbler. We should provide an instant, accurate, comprehensive and consistent system for background checks to sellers who want to do the right thing, and make sure that criminals can’t escape it.
Porous background checks are bad for police officers, for law-abiding citizens and for the sellers themselves. If we’re serious about keeping guns away from someone who’s made up his mind to kill, then we can’t allow a situation where a responsible seller denies him a weapon at one store, but he effortlessly buys the same gun someplace else.
Clearly, there’s more we can do to prevent gun violence. But I want this to at least be the beginning of a new discussion on how we can keep America safe for all our people.
I know some aren’t interested in participating. Some will say that anything short of the most sweeping anti-gun legislation is a capitulation to the gun lobby. Others will predictably cast any discussion as the opening salvo in a wild-eyed scheme to take away everybody’s guns. And such hyperbole will become the fodder for overheated fundraising letters.
But I have more faith in the American people than that. Most gun-control advocates know that most gun owners are responsible citizens. Most gun owners know that the word “commonsense” isn’t a code word for “confiscation.” And none of us should be willing to remain passive in the face of violence or resigned to watching helplessly as another rampage unfolds on television.
As long as those whose lives are shattered by gun violence don’t get to look away and move on, neither can we.
We owe the victims of the tragedy in Tucson and the countless unheralded tragedies each year nothing less than our best efforts – to seek consensus, to prevent future bloodshed, to forge a nation worthy of our children’s futures.
Copyright 2011 Arizona Daily Star. All rights reserved.
CHILD PREDATOR: COME LI COMBATTONO IN AMERICA
Le televisioni e radio americane da anni stanno affrontando il grave problema della molestia e della violenza sui bambini e adolescenti. MSNBC lo fa attrezzando un set in alcune case con telecamere nascoste. Una attrice che si finge teenager riceve il ‘predator’che l’ha conosciuta su un sito Internet ed ha scambiato con lei laide proposte. Interviene poi il conduttore della trasmissione che contesta al ‘predator’ il suo comportamento. Quando il mancato molestatore esce dalla casa viene agguantato dalla polizia e condotto in carcere. Segue processo con tutti i problemi relativi che e’ facile immaginare. Molti sostengono che si tratta di una gogna mediatica, fatta solo per aumentare l’audience. Un dato di fatto certo e’ che, grazie a queste trasmissioni, centinaia di pedofili sono stati assicurati alla giustizia e molti altri hanno desistito dai loro propositi.
Oscar Bartoli
Lascia un commento